Yes, they're pretty openly slanted to the left. However, so am I! As such, I don't mind that public money is used to support their operation (I know that rightfully bothers quite a few people).
Two of their regular segments, Fresh Air and All Things Considered, are the only reasons I bother turning the radio on anymore. Yesterday, Fresh Air had an excellent piece on newspapers and democracy in an interview with Alex Jones, a Pulitzer Prize winner. I'm sure this argument has been made before, but I'll repeat here: as we know, newspapers have been under tremendous financial pressure over the last decade or so, as the advent of the internet has replaced newspapers as the primary source of information for many people. Many newspapers across the country have closed down - and newspapers are, according to Jones, by far the largest provider of investigative journalism. This NPR piece discusses Jones' contention that democracy functions best when there is an excellent core of true investigative journalism that covers everything from international to national to local news and issues. He's naturally biased to this viewpoint, but I think there's a strong case to be made for his side. Indeed, evening news is now dominated by personalities rather than reporters, and it's important to remember that these personalities often offer opinions rather than simply facts. I would encourage everyone who reads this to listen to the segment, which is linked above.
I bring this issue up in this blog because of the recent controversy over health care, an economic issue that affects us all. As you might know, costs of health care have been skyrocketing recently, and are projected to continue doing so, which is why reform has become such a huge and necessary issue. Here is one summary of the cost aspect that was emailed to me. The numbers in that article are frightening. What is just as interesting is the final paragraph:
It is a pity that this central issue seems to have been shoved aside by mendacious distortions from Sarah Palin, Betsy McCaughey, Rush Limbaugh and other extremist commentators seeking to frighten Americans with their prattle about "death panels" and "pulling plugs on granny" that no bill before Congress even remotely envisions.
This seems directly related to the Fresh Air piece above: talking heads who aren't necessarily reporting the facts are screwing up the democratic process: the recent outrageous town-hall protests are evidence that dialogue is not taking place; instead, angry and misinformed people are drowning out useful debate on the issue. And it may be that the slow death of newspapers, which naturally kills off investigative journalism, will only exacerbate this problem (along with others) over time. Unless someone steps forward to pay for investigative journalism, the beliefs of the general public may be more easily swayed by TV personalities than their own opinions based on the evening news.
If anyone has articles or their own opinion to share, on either topic, please do send them my way. Health care in particular is an issue that I have very little understanding of, and this is something I need to fix as it seems to now be one of the bigger economic issues in this country.
**UPDATE** I realize that I criticize talking heads for providing opinion-based journalism despite earlier saying I love NPR despite it's leftist slant. I want to make it clear that I do not listen to NPR for news, but rather for special programs like Fresh Air, with the express intent of hearing out opinionated discussions on, often-times, esoteric topics. News for me generally comes from CNN and the NYT (both of whom, usually, openly distinguish news reporting from their op-ed pieces).
AMD's Quiet Edge In AI Inference
18 minutes ago
If newspapers are indeed dying then what is your solution. I am not sure I saw any solution in the blog. Since you openly admitted in the blog that you are left oriented let me give you a left-oriented solution. Why doesn't governemtn tax 10 cents for every tax return filed and call it "Truth Tax". That way government can generate millions of dolalrs of revenue for truth dissemination. Then governemtn will decide (like it has decided in the cap and trade system) which newspapers are worthy of receiving funding from such a Truth Tax. Ofcourse now lets say with Democratic dominated legislature and executive branch newspapers like NYT will be considered much more worthy than say Wall Street Journal or Investor's Business Daily. So NYT will get lions share of such funding and they will use it to disseminate truth. And as they say we will all live happily ever after as NYT will truthfully give us truth.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment..
ReplyDeleteIf you listen to the NPR piece, some solutions are offered - and despite its leftist leanings, the solution is nowhere near as extreme as your proposal. One is as simple as newspapers figuring out a way to generate profit again, so they can re-invest into their core business of investigative journalism. For example, some newspapers now own side businesses such as owning billboards or producing ad booklets, both of which generate the extra revenue needed for profitability. Another is that some papers (the specific one mentioned was the Boston Globe) had some 'job-for-life' contracts that simply cannot be afforded in this day and age. Removal of these contracts would help with profitability. This alone might be a solution. For what it's worth, I do believe some newspapers, after a decade of working towards becoming lean operations, are now slightly profitable again.
To be honest, I don't have a good, clean solution that doesn't come from newspapers themselves. I think the best path would be for newspapers (assuming, of course, that they are indeed the best providers of investigative journalism) to fund it themselves. I absolutely do not believe in government-disseminated news - that's much further left than I would ever want to go.
I think that a lot of the lack of good journalism has to do with media consolidation by large conglomerates. For instance the fact that GE owns NBC (which is satirized in 30 Rock) leads to obvious conflicts of interest that impact the quality of news, advertising etc. Time Warner (largest magazine publisher in US)can push for a hike in postal rates that favours large publishers while increasing the postal rates of small and medium publishers up to 25%! Time Warner was able to get the Postal Board of Governors to approve it's plan in March 09 and tell everyone (including Congress) about it after the fact! And speaking of government disseminated news, are you referring to the mad rush to war in 2002/2003 spurred on by all media outlets (Fox to NYT) except the truly independent ones (The Nation, Pacifica, Mother Jones, Truthout, Truthdig)?
ReplyDelete